LiverHope

VOLUME 6, ISSUE 3                                                                                                                       March 2004


Calendar

March 9th – “What Should HCV Patients Expect From Their Health Care Providers?”

Janet Durfee[1] – Hepatitis C Nurse Practitioner - VA Medical Center

March 21st – LiverHope too – By Appointment

April 13th – Open Discussion

April 18th – LiverHope too – By Appointment

 

liverHope Meetings are:

7:00 - 9:00 PM, 2nd and 4th Tuesdays unless otherwise noted.

Shepherd of the Hills Lutheran Church

3920 North Victoria Street, Shoreview, MN

 

LiverHope Too Meetings are:

7:00 – 9:00 PM, 3rd Sunday of the Month at Pat’s home:

901 Meadowwood Drive, Brooklyn Park, MN.  Please enter the door facing the driveway.  Call Pat at (763) 566-3839 for directions.

Our Thanks

To Dr. John Lake for coming and sharing his Liver Transplant and Hepatitis C knowledge and expertise.  He has infinite patience and spent the evening answering all of our questions.

Are you newly diagnosed or do you want more information about Hepatitis C?

-         Attend LiverHope too  -

-         By Appointment  -

-         March 21st, 2004  -

 

 

 

In This Issue

 
 

 

 


Calendar 1

Insights from Retreatment of Non-Responders of Interferon Based Therapies with Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin  1

APRICOT Study: Combination Treatment and HIV/HCV Coinfection  2

Vioxx Prevents Reduction in Platelets During Pegasys Therapy for HCV: Short Term Pilot Study  3

Doctors broach idea of selling body organs. 3

VA Revises Priority for Doctor Visits. 4

"Seven Wonders of the World". 5

 

Insights from Retreatment of Non-Responders of Interferon Based Therapies with Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin

02/06/2004  Veritas Medicine Viewpoint

Chinweike Ukomadu, M.D., Ph.D.

Instructor in Medicine, Harvard Medical School

In an upcoming article in Gastroenterology, investigators report on their observations from over 600 patients who had failed prior treatment for chronic hepatitis C infections. The investigators studied the response of this group of patients who had failed therapy with alfa interferon alone or in combination with ribavirin.  Most of the patients were infected with genotype 1 virus. Treatment was with Pegasys 180 mcg subcutaneously every week and ribavirin between 1000 mg-1200 mg a day.

The investigators found that after 20 weeks, 35% of patients had no detectable virus. This group was treated for a further 28 weeks and then evaluated 24 weeks after treatment. They noted that 18% of the retreated group achieved sustained virologic response (SVR).

Prognostic data on who would benefit from retreatment was mostly as expected 1) patients who were previously treated with interferon monotherapy 2) patients infected with genotype


2 or 3 virus 3) patients without cirrhosis 4) patients with viral loads of less than 1.5 million copies.

What was unexpected and what this writer feels is an extremely important observation is the effect of dose reduction of pegylated interferon and ribavirin on SVR.

The investigators noted that dose reduction of pegylated interferon as is usually done for side effects of neutropenia (low white blood cells) or thrombocytopenia (low platelets) did not affect SVR. However, reduction of ribavirin dose (usually done for anemia) before the 20th week of treatment resulted in lower SVR.

The importance of this last finding if validated is that our current thinking of side effect management will change. It implies that growth factors currently given to patients with neutropenia (e.g. Neupogen) to help maintain interferon dose may be unnecessary while such growth factors given to reverse anemia (e.g. Procrit, Epogen) may be absolutely essential to prevent ribavirin dose decreases.

Reference: Mitchell L Shiffman , Adrian M Di Bisceglie , Karen L Lindsay, Chihiro Morishima ,  Elizabeth C Wright et al. Peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis c who have failed prior treatment. Gastroenterology, In press

APRICOT Study: Combination Treatment and HIV/HCV Coinfection

New York, Feb. 12 /PRNewswire/ -- A Mount Sinai School of Medicine researcher reported results from a study with a drug combination that showed the highest hepatitis C treatment response rates ever reported in patients infected with hepatitis C and HIV virus on Tuesday, February 10 at the 11th annual Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI).

The multinational APRICOT (AIDS PEGASYS® Ribavirin International Co-infection Trial) study found that the drug combination of Pegasys® (peginterferon alfa-2a) and Copegus® (ribavirin) were much more effective than the previous generation of hepatitis C therapy standard interferon and ribavirin.  Efficacy was measured as the sustained virological response (SVR) rate, which is defined by the absence of detectable HCV RNA in the serum for at least six months after treatment. Dr. Douglas Dieterich, Professor of Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York City, and lead investigator on the APRICOT trial presented the study results at the meeting.  The study was funded by Roche, the developers of Pegasys.

HCV and HIV are the two most prevalent blood-borne infections in the United States.  Of the nearly one million people estimated to have HIV in the U.S., approximately 300,000 are believed to be co-infected with HCV.  It can take 10 to 20 years following infection with hepatitis for a person to progress to end stage liver disease.  However, in patients with HIV, the disease progresses far more quickly.  With advances in HIV therapy prolonging the life expectancy of HIV patients, hepatitis C is now a major threat to people with HIV.

"The results from this trial are very exciting news for the hundreds of thousands of Americans who are living with hepatitis C and HIV," said Dr. Dieterich.  "They prove that, through treatment with Pegasys and Copegus, these patients can be treated successfully for their HCV -- without compromising their HIV status."

Results from the study report 40 percent overall efficacy among co-infected patients and, when analyzed by genotype, 62 percent efficacy in patients with genotypes 2 and 3, and 29 percent in those with genotype 1. Genotype 1 is typically the most difficult strain of HCV to treat.  Four times more genotype 1 patients cleared the hepatitis C virus with Pegasys in combination with Copegus than with those treated with standard interferon/ribavirin combination therapy (29% vs. 7% respectively). Additionally, Pegasys monotherapy showed superior efficacy to treatment with standard interferon and ribavirin (20 percent vs. 12 percent), which is important for patients who cannot tolerate ribavirin.

The randomized, partially blinded international trial had a total of 868 HCV/HIV co-infected patients in 19 countries, and is currently, the largest study conducted among this patient population.  All patients were HCV positive, had compensated liver disease, a CD4+ count greater than 100 cells/mL, and stable HIV disease, with or without antiretroviral therapy. Patients were randomized to 48 weeks of treatment with interferon three times a week plus 800 mg/day of ribavirin, 180 mcg of Pegasys once weekly plus placebo, or 180 mcg of Pegasys once weekly with 800 mg/day of Copegus. Sustained virological response (SVR) was accessed at the end of 24 weeks of treatment-free follow up (week 72).

Negative predictability ranged from 98 to 100 percent at 12 weeks. Negative predictability means that patients can determine by week 12 if they are unlikely to respond to therapy with Pegasys so decisions about the continuance of treatment can be made in that time.  In addition, HIV viral levels were not negatively impacted by treatment with Pegasys and Copegus combination therapy, and no new safety concerns were reported with this study. Pegasys is a well-tolerated medication, even with the addition of full doses of ribavirin.  In this study, the most commonly reported side effects were fatigue, fever and headache.

Co-authors on the study include J. Torriani, University of California, San Diego, CA; J. Rockstroh, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; M. Rodriguez- Torres, Fundacion de Investigacion de Diego, Santurce, Puerto Rico; E. Lissen, Virgen del Rocmo University Hospital, Seville, Spain; J. Gonzalez, Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain; A. Lazzarin, San Raffaele Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy; G. Carosi,  University of Brescia, Italy; J. Sasadeusz, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia; C. Katlama, Groupe Hospitalier de la Pitie Salpetriere, Paris, France; J. Montaner, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; H. Sette, Instituto de Infectologia Emilio Ribas, Sao Paulo, Brazil; F. Duff, Roche, Nutley, NJ, USA , J. DePamphilis, Roche, Nutley, NJ, USA; U. M. Schrenk, Roche, Basel; Switzerland.

Vioxx Prevents Reduction in Platelets During Pegasys Therapy for HCV: Short Term Pilot Study

Reported by Jules Levin NATAP

54th AASLD Meeting - Oct 25-29, 2003 - Boston, MA

David H. Van Thiel and researchers at University Medical Center, Maywood, IL reported at AASLD (Oct 2003) on seeing increase of platelets during treatment for HCV with Pegasys. In order to improve tolerability for HCV IFN/RBV therapy non-steroidal ant-inflammatory medications are often used, such as Motrin, Tylenol, Advil, etc. Vioxx is an anti-arthritis drug sometimes often used by doctors for the same purpose, to reduce the body aches, arthralgia and myalgia, associated with IFN/RBV therapy. This pilot study reports for the first time that Vioxx may also improve platelet count reductions associated with IFN/RBV therapy, called thrombocytopenia.

Thrombocytopenia (reduced platelet count) is a major limiting factor in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C with interferon preparations. This is particularly true for individuals with advanced disease because of a combination of factors that include: 1) reduced thrombopoietin production by the diseased liver, 2) hypersplenism and 3) actions of interferon per se.

The use of a Cox II inhibitor like Vioxx (rofecoxib) is known to inhibit the inflammatory and vasoconstriction actions of prostacyclin but has little or no effect on prostaglandin production and any adverse effect on iNOS and the production of NO, actions that are inhibited by nonselective NSAIDS.

The aim of the present short-term pilot study was to define the effect of Vioxx combined with Pegasys as compared to Pegasys therapy alone for chronic hepatitis C on platelet numbers and the expected decline in platelet numbers associated with Pegasys therapy.

Eighteen subjects with chronic hepatitis C documented by positivity for anti-HCV, HCV-RNA and abnormal liver injury tests and a liver biopsy consistent with chronic hepatitis C were treated with Pegasys 180ug SQ weekly plus daily oral Vioxx (12.5mg/day) or Pegasys alone for 8 weeks.

The changes in Hgb, WBC, platelet count, serum ALT, AST, BUN, creatinine and viral load were assessed weekly in both groups.

No differences in the levels of Hgb or WBC counts were evident between the two groups treated with Pegasys. Similarly, no change in the serum ALT, AST, BUN and creatinine levels were observed between the 2 groups.

In contrast, the platelet count declined from a mean baseline value of 193±13 in the group treated with Pegasys and Vioxx such that at 8 weeks, the value was 162±12, a 16% decline. The decline in platelet count in the group not using Vioxx was 41% with a reduction in platelets from 166 ±18 to a value of 89±11.

These data demonstrate that Vioxx, when used in combination with Pegasys to treat advanced chronic hepatitis C, results in a highly significant reduction in the decline in platelet numbers associated with Pegasys therapy.

Importantly, this platelet sparing effect of Vioxx is not associated with an alteration in the values for Hgb, WBC, BUN or creatinine.

This suggests that patients with advanced disease (stage 3 or 4), who have baseline thrombocytopenia, should be treated with Vioxx (rofecoxib) as well as Pegasys in an effort to avoid high-grade thrombocytopenia that might limit the dose or duration of Pegasys therapy when used alone to treat chronic hepatitis C.

Doctors broach idea of selling body organs

Poor people might be the primary donors, but they would make money and save lives

By Helen Altonn

Honolulu Star-Bulletin – 2-14-04

Many transplant patients are dying while waiting for organs that could be supplied through organ sales, some doctors suggest.


The two controversial ideas were aired at an International Bioethics Conference attended by more than 250 medical professionals, attorneys and bioethics experts on February 12 and 13, 2004, at St. Francis Medical Center in Honolulu.

Dr. Arthur Matas, University of Minnesota Renal Transplant Service director, said paying unrelated living donors for kidneys, now a federal crime, would be cost-effective compared with extended dialysis.

He advocates a regulated system with specified centers; a fixed, tax-free price for kidneys; and allocation to patients the same as it is done now.

Matas acknowledged ethical concerns about selling body parts and the likelihood that most sales would be by poor people. But they would benefit from the income, and fewer people would die waiting for transplants, he said.

Dr. S.Y. Tan, conference co-chairman and director of the St. Francis International Center for Healthcare Ethics, supported an organ-sales program, saying, "We should save lives."

Another approach is "presumed consent," he said.

Adults who die would be presumed to have agreed to donate their organs for transplantation unless they "opt out" with a registered refusal, he said. This would result in a lot of organs for transplant operations, he said, "but there are critics aplenty."

Critics say mistakes are inevitable, problems would occur in registering and transmitting a person's objection, and the system undermines individual autonomy and the right to delegate decisions to family members, he said.

Tan said Singapore has progressive policies on organ donations, including a presumed-consent law for anyone except Muslims, and donations have increased sevenfold.

Only an average of 12 organs are donated in Hawaii every year, he said, while as of January, 344 patients were waiting for kidneys, 23 for livers, four for hearts and two for a kidney and pancreas.

"Setting Limits to Healthcare: The Time Is Now" was the theme of the conference, with speakers exploring health care reforms and rationing to control skyrocketing costs.

Dr. Lawrence Schneiderman, professor of family and preventive medicine, University of California-San Diego, said managed health care has failed to control costs and put doctors in "a true ethical dilemma."

Their responsibility is to serve the best interests of the patients, but managed care bases their income on giving less care, he said, adding that this has eroded patients' trust in doctors.

Canada, Britain and Singapore also are grappling with health system problems, speakers explained.

For example, Canada gives everyone access to health care, but patients have to wait months to years for consultations and procedures unless it is an emergency, said neurologist Dan Krushelnycky, St. Francis International Center for Healthcare Ethics fellow.

Canadians want the kind of health care Americans have, with speed and access to technology, and Americans want what the Canadians have with basic coverage for all people, he said.

"I think we will see a convergence," he said.

VA Revises Priority for Doctor Visits

By Suzanne Gamboa

The Associated Press

Saturday, January 3, 2004

WASHINGTON - Veterans needing medical help about health problems stemming from their military service will be scheduled first for nonemergency appointments under new rules announced by the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Appointments for such veterans must be scheduled within 30 days of the request. When an appointment is unavailable, the VA must arrange for care at another VA facility or contract out for it, VA Secretary Anthony Principi said in a statement Friday.

Any veteran needing emergency care still will be treated immediately. The new rule changes a policy in which veterans with service-connected health issues, such as a war injury or certain cancers related to Agent Orange exposure and who are not severely disabled, waited with other veterans for appointments.

Last October, Principi gave priority for appointments to veterans with 50 percent or more disability ratings. Such severely disabled veterans also get priority for nonservice-related health problems.

"If a veteran cannot see a doctor in a timely manner, then we have failed that veteran," Principi said.

Veterans have been enduring waits of up to two years for appointments since demand increased after the VA opened its medical facilities to all veterans in 1998. The VA has made


some progress toward reducing waiting times. Principi hoped that by the end of 2003, veterans would need to wait no more than 30 days to see a primary care physician.

Phil Budahn, a VA spokesman, said that in July 2002 more than 300,000 veterans had been waiting more than six months for primary care appointments at VA institutions. The list has dropped to about 30,000, he said.

John Brieden, the American Legion's national commander, said the new rule shows that the VA health care system is so burdened that it cannot handle the demand and should get more money.

"What they are doing is admitting they can't do it for everybody they are supposed to do it for, so they must put priority on some folks and tell others, “Gee, we can't see you right now,'" Brieden said.

The House has passed a spending bill containing $28.6 billion for veterans' health care, $2.8 billion more than last year's allocation. The Senate should take up the bill when it reconvenes Jan. 20. Brieden said the additional money should relieve some of the demand, but it won't be enough to allow higher-income veterans eliminated from VA health care last year to re-enter the system.

Last January, Principi barred new enrollment of higher-income veterans in the VA health care system without health problems related to their military service. He's required by law to re-evaluate that decision this year.

On the Net: Veterans Affairs: http://www.va.gov
Source:  washingtonpost.com

"Seven Wonders of the World"

A group of students were asked to list what they thought were the present "Seven Wonders of the World." Though there were some disagreements, the following received the most votes:

1.       Egypt's Great Pyramids

2.       Taj Mahal

3.       Grand Canyon

4.       Panama Canal

5.       Empire State Building

6.       St. Peter's Basilica

7.       China's Great Wall

While gathering the votes, the teacher noted that one student had not finished her paper yet. So she asked the girl if she


was having trouble with her list. The girl replied, "Yes, a little. I couldn't quite make up my mind because there were so many."

The teacher said, "Well, tell us what you have, and maybe we can help."

The girl hesitated, then read, "I think the 'Seven Wonders of the World' are:

1.       To See

2.       To Hear

3.       To Touch

4.       To Taste

5.       To Feel

6.       To Laugh

7.       And to Love."

The room was so quiet you could have heard a pin drop. The things we overlook as simple and ordinary and that we take for granted are truly wondrous! A gentle reminder -- that the most precious things in life cannot be built by hand or bought by man.

 

LiverHope Support Group
Helen Clark & Pat Buchanan

Co-Facilitators

16807 Canterbury Drive

Minnetonka, MN 55345-2621

Voicemail: (763) 780-0108

Email: info@liverhope.com

Fax: (763) 566-0589

Website: www.liverhope.com

Helen: (952) 933-0932 – helen@liverhope.com

Pat: (763) 566-3839 – pat@liverhope.com

 



[1] Janet Durfee is a Nurse Practitioner at the Chronic Hepatitis Clinic at the Minneapolis VA Medical Center.  She is an adjunct professor at the University Of Minnesota School Of Nursing. Ms. Durfee has served in United States Navy Nurse Corps for 11 years, with 4 years active duty and 7 years in the Reserves.  She has served at military bases worldwide.  Ms. Durfee received her BA degree from Concordia College in Moorhead, MN and went on to graduate school at George Washington University in Washington DC where she earned her Masters Degree as an Adult Nurse Practitioner.  She is a member of numerous societies and nursing organizations and has contributed to various publications related to hepatitis C.